People v. Brentlinger CA6
Filed 4/28/16 P. v. Brentlinger CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, H042212 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. CC507803)
v.
DAVID LEE BRENTLINGER,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant David Lee Brentlinger filed a petition in which he sought to reduce his felony convictions for a 1980 assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a))1 and a 1993 petty theft with a prior conviction (§ 666) to misdemeanors. The trial court denied the petition as to the assault conviction, but failed to rule on the petty theft with a prior conviction. We remand the matter to the trial court for consideration of defendant’s petition as to his petty theft with a prior conviction.
1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
I. Discussion Defendant contends, and the Attorney General concedes, that the trial court erred when it failed to either grant or deny his petition for recall of his sentence as to his petty theft with a prior conviction.2 The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Proposition 47, as approved by the voters, Gen Elec. (Nov. 4, 2014)) added section 1170.18, which became effective on November 5, 2014. Among other things, Proposition 47 reduced certain theft and drug possession felonies. (§ 1170.18, subd. (a).) It also created a resentencing provision by which a person serving a felony sentence for an offense that is now a misdemeanor may petition for recall of that sentence and request resentencing in accordance with the offense statutes as added or amended by Proposition 47. (§ 1170.18, subd. (a).) Section 1170.18 provides in relevant part: “A person currently serving a sentence for a conviction, whether by trial or plea, of a felony or felonies who would have been guilty of a misdemeanor under the act that added this section (‘this act’) had this act been in effect at the time of the offense may petition for a recall of sentence before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case to request resentencing in accordance with Sections 11350, 11357, or 11377 of the Health and Safety Code, or Section 459.5, 473, 476a, 490.2, 496, or 666 of the Penal Code, as those sections have been amended or added by this act.” (§ 1170.18, subd. (a).) Section 1170.18, subdivision (b) provides that a court that receives such a petition shall resentence the petitioner “unless the court, in its discretion, determines that resentencing the petitioner would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety.” Here, defendant filed a petition in which he requested that two offenses be reduced from felonies to misdemeanors: assault with a deadly weapon and petty theft with priors.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)