In re Alexander G. CA5

Filed 4/25/16 In re Alexander G. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re ALEXANDER G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, F071512

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 14 JQ0041A)

v. OPINION ALEXANDER G.,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT* APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Kings County. James LaPorte, Judge.

Randall Conner, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

*Before Kane, Acting P.J., Detjen, J. and Peña, J.

INTRODUCTION The minor Alexander G. was adjudicated a ward of the court and placed on probation. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We affirm the orders of the juvenile court. PROCEEDINGS At the conclusion of a contested jurisdiction hearing on April 16, 2015, the juvenile court found true allegations filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 that Alexander G. (age 16) possessed an explosive destructive device (Pen. Code, § 18715, subd. (a), count 1) and possessed materials with the intent to make a destructive device (id., § 18720, count 2). On April 29, 2015, the juvenile court found defendant violated the conditions of his probation based on deferred entry of judgment for a prior adjudication for unauthorized computer access and fraud (Pen. Code, § 502, subd. (c)(5), second degree burglary (id., § 459), resisting arrest (id., § 148, subd. (a)(1)), vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), and driving without a valid driver’s license (id., § 12500, subd. (a)). The juvenile court found both count 1 and count 2 to be felonies. The juvenile court placed defendant on probation upon various terms and conditions. The juvenile court continued the disposition hearing to make a final determination of minor’s maximum term of physical confinement. On May 19, 2015, the juvenile court found minor’s maximum term of physical confinement was nine years six months with custody credits of 76 days.1 On October 14, 2015, the juvenile court granted the minor’s motion to stay his maximum term of physical confinement on count 2 pursuant to Penal Code section 654. The court reduced maximum term of physical confinement to eight years six months and determined his total custody credits to be 79 days.