People v. Hreha CA4/3

Filed 4/14/16 P. v. Hreha CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). The opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G052918

v. (Super. Ct. No. P-00680)

ROBERT ANDREW HREHA, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Craig E. Robison, Judge (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.); and David Hoffer, Judge. Affirmed. Kristen Owen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *

The trial court found Robert Andrew Hreha violated the conditions of his parole by failing to charge his Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device. The court imposed a 180-day term in custody. Hreha appealed, and his appointed counsel filed a brief under the procedures outlined in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Counsel summarized the facts and procedural history of the case, but raised no specific issues, and asked this court to review the record to determine whether there were any arguable matters. Counsel submitted a declaration stating she thoroughly reviewed the record. Counsel advised Hreha she would file a Wende brief, and provided a copy of the brief to him. She also advised Hreha he could personally file a supplemental brief on his own behalf raising any issues he believed worthy of consideration, and made a copy of the appellate record available to him. Counsel did not argue against her client or offer an opinion on the merits of the appeal. She informed Hreha he could ask the court to relieve her as counsel. We gave Hreha 30 days to file a supplemental brief, but he has not responded. We have reviewed the record, found no arguable issues, and therefore affirm the order.