People v. Hove CA4/2

Filed 3/1/16 P. v. Hove CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E063911

v. (Super.Ct.No. FWV1402020)

LISA LYNN HOVE, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Stanford E.

Reichert, Judge. Affirmed.

Denise M. Rudasill, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant Lisa Hove appeals from the denial of her petition for resentencing

under Proposition 47. We affirm because neither the conviction in the current case, nor

1

the conviction upon which the sentence enhancement in the current case is based, are

eligible for reduction to misdemeanors under Proposition 47.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 5, 2014, defendant pled no contest to sale/transportation/offer to

sell a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a))1 and admitted that