People v. Stanfill CA4/2

Filed 2/11/16 P. v. Stanfill CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E064275

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1403392)

RYAN ADAM STANFILL, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Judith C. Clark, Judge.

Affirmed.

Mark D. Johnson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant, Ryan Adam Stanfill, filed a petition for resentencing

pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18,1 which the court denied. After defendant filed a

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

1

notice of appeal, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief

under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case and identifying one potentially