People v. Underwood CA2/1
Filed 2/8/16 P. v. Underwood CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, B262803
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA306194) v.
WILLIE UNDERWOOD,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. William C. Ryan, Judge. Affirmed. Eric Robert Larson for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Noah P. Hill and Theresa A. Patterson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________
Defendant Willie Underwood appeals from an order denying and dismissing his petition for recall of sentence on three counts under Penal Code section 1170.126.1 Underwood argues he is eligible for resentencing on two counts in light of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. Johnson (2015) 61 Cal.4th 674 (Johnson). While acknowledging Johnson’s applicability, the Attorney General argues Underwood nevertheless remains ineligible for resentencing as defined by sections 1170.126, subdivision (e)(2), 667, subdivision (e)(2)(C)(iii), and 1170.12, subdivision (c)(2)(C)(iii) because he was armed. We affirm. BACKGROUND Following a jury trial in 2007, Underwood was convicted of (1) assault with a semiautomatic firearm (§ 245, subd. (b)); (2) felony evasion of a peace officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)); and (3) possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon (former § 12021, subd. (a)(1), now § 29800, subd. (a)(1).)2 The court sentenced him to a total term of 6 years plus 77 years to life in prison under the three strikes law. (See People v. Underwood (Feb. 25, 2010, B212973, at p. 7 [nonpub. opn.] (Underwood I).)3 Underwood appealed, but the appellate court upheld Underwood’s conviction and sentence. (Underwood I, at pp. 1, 19.)4 Underwood petitioned the Supreme Court for review, but the Supreme Court denied review. Following California’s implementation of Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, Underwood filed a petition for
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)