In re V.N. CA2/5

Filed 12/31/15 In re V.N. CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re V.N. et al., Persons Coming Under the B259606 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. DK05329)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

A.N.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Marguerite D. Downing, Judge. Reversed with directions. Amy Z. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Mary C. Wickham, Interim County Counsel, Dawyn R. Harrison, Assistant County Counsel, Jeanette Cauble, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Mary Keenan for the Minor and Respondent.

A.N., the presumed father of the two children, V.N. and Danica N., appeals from a

Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 parental rights termination order. The

presumed father contends the parental rights termination order must be reversed because

of noncompliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act and related California provisions.

The parties have stipulated to a limited reversal of the parental rights termination order to

allow compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act and related California provisions. In

addition, the parties have stipulated to immediate remittitur issuance.