People v. Keukelaar CA3
Filed 12/15/15 P. v Keukelaar CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ----
THE PEOPLE, C079129
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62118138)
v.
CARLOS RUEBEN KEUKELAAR,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Carlos Rueben Keukelaar has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment and remand the matter to the trial court with directions to amend the abstract of judgment to
1
reflect the amounts and statutory bases for all fees, fines, penalties, and assessments imposed. I We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) On October 7, 2012, Wal-Mart employees reported to police that defendant was acting strangely. Records revealed defendant, a convicted felon, was on searchable probation. When police searched him, they found his pocket contained two “speed loaders,” each with five rounds of ammunition. A search of defendant’s car revealed a loaded .38-caliber revolver. On November 21, 2013, defendant was charged by first amended information with receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a) -- count one),1 carrying a loaded firearm in public while having a prior conviction for a crime against a person and property and of a narcotics and dangerous drug violation (§ 25850, subds. (a), (c)(5) -- count two), possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1) -- count three), possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1) -- count four), and possession of a firearm within 10 years of a qualifying conviction (§ 29805 -- count five). The amended information alleged that, as to counts two, three, and four, defendant suffered a prior felony conviction and, as to counts four and five, defendant suffered three prior qualifying convictions. On January 31, 2014, defendant entered a plea of no contest to count four and admitted the prior misdemeanor conviction for violation of section 241, subdivision (b).
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)