People v. Calvin CA4/3

Filed 11/9/15 P. v. Calvin CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G051803

v. (Super. Ct. No. 10HF0179)

CALVIN JAMES CALVIN, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kazuharu Makino, Judge. (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. Calvin James Calvin, in pro. per.; and Patrick J. Hennessey, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *

Defendant Calvin James Calvin was convicted by a jury of multiple counts of grand theft and using an untrue statement in the sale of a security. In an earlier opinion, this court affirmed defendant’s conviction. (People v. Calvin (Nov. 25, 2014, G048597) [nonpub. opn.].) Defendant later filed a petition to reduce all of the felony grand theft charges to misdemeanors. The trial court denied the petition, and defendant appeals. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), setting forth the facts of the case, raising no issues, and requesting that we independently review the entire record. We provided defendant 30 days to file written argument on his own behalf; he did so. We have examined the entire record, appointed appellate counsel’s Wende/Anders brief, and defendant’s supplemental brief; we find no reasonably arguable issue. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) We therefore affirm.