People v. Inga CA4/1
Filed 10/16/15 P. v. Inga CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D067716
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD236182)
FRANK WILLIAM INGA,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,
Leo Valentine, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.
Allison H. Ting, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
A jury found Frank William Inga guilty of two counts of oral copulation with a
child 10 years old or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b); counts 1 & 2),1 one count of
1 Further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 (§ 288, subd. (b)(1); count 3), and two
counts of committing a lewd act upon a child (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 4 & 5). The jury
found true allegations Inga engaged in substantial sexual contact with a child under the
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)