In re J.B. CA2/7

California Court of Appeal Oct 13, 2015 No. B259641Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the juvenile court erred in calculating predisposition custody credits by failing to aggregate credits from multiple petitions, and that the trial court properly conducted an in camera review of officer personnel records.

Issues

Whether the juvenile court erred in its calculation of predisposition custody credits.
Whether the juvenile court properly handled the Pitchess motion regarding the disclosure of arresting officers' personnel files.

Disposition. Affirmed as modified

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“J.B. contends, the People acknowledge, and we agree the juvenile court erred in calculating his predisposition custody credits as 27 days.”

Filed 10/13/15 In re J.B. CA2/7 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re J.B., B259641

a Person Coming Under the Juvenile (Los Angeles County Court Law. Super. Ct. No. TJ20568)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

J.B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Catherine J. Pratt, Juvenile Court Referee. Affirmed as modified. Shawna L. Parks, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson, Noah P. Hill and Viet H. Nguyen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________

J.B. appeals from a disposition order of the juvenile court. J.B. contends his predisposition custody credits were miscalculated and asks us to review the sealed transcript of the hearing regarding disclosure of the arresting officers’ personnel files. We affirm the order as modified.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The Earlier Delinquency Petitions As is relevant here, J.B. had two Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petitions that were previously sustained by the juvenile court: A petition filed June 14, 2013, for which the court found true the allegation J.B. had committed the offense of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496),1 and another filed December 18, 2013 for which the court found true the allegation that J.B. had committed the offense of possession of a firearm by a minor (§ 29610). Each offense, which was declared a felony, carries a three-year maximum term of imprisonment.2

In re J.B. CA2/7

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE,

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

PERLUSS, P. J.

SEGAL, J.

AI Brief