In re S.C. CA3
Filed 9/9/15 In re S.C. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ----
In re S.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C077788 Law.
PLACER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (Super. Ct. No. 53004135) AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
K.G.,
Defendant and Appellant.
Kenneth G., alleged father of the minor S.C., appeals from the judgment of disposition placing S.C. in foster care. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 395.)1 Father, who is incarcerated out-of-state, contends in relevant part that the juvenile court erred in failing
1 Further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.
1
to give him an opportunity to establish paternity. Respondent Placer County Department of Health and Human Services (Department) challenges father’s standing to bring this appeal. As we will explain, we agree that father lacks standing. We shall dismiss his appeal. FACTS In September 2014, the Department filed a petition alleging the minor was suffering serious emotional damage because there was no parent capable of providing her appropriate care. Mother was unable to provide for her and father was in prison in North Carolina. Mother told the court she had been unable to locate father until the minor was 12 years old; after that, father exchanged letters with the minor but had no other contact. At the detention hearing, the juvenile court designated father as alleged. The Department located father after an inmate search and, on September 22, 2014, sent him notice of the pending jurisdiction hearing, to be held on October 16, 2014. The notice was received September 26, 2014. The notice, using the JV-280 form, included the court’s mailing address and telephone number, as well as the advisement: “You have the right to be present at the hearing, to present evidence, and to be represented by an attorney. . . . [T]he court will appoint an attorney for you if you cannot afford one.” That same day, the clerk also mailed father copies of the petition, the detention report, the detention orders, a parent handbook, and several forms including the JV-505.2
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)