In re Javier C. CA6

Filed 7/24/15 In re Javier C. CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re JAVIER C., a Person Coming Under H041597 the Juvenile Court Law. (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 3-14-JV40523 A & B)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JAVIER C.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for minor Javier C. has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende); In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97, 119.) We find no arguable issues on appeal and affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

I. Statement of the Case In February 2014, a juvenile wardship petition (Petition A) was filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a). The petition alleged that appellant, who was then 16 years old, committed the following misdemeanors:

exhibiting a deadly weapon other than a firearm (Pen. Code, § 417, subd. (a)(1) – count 1); trespass on transit-related property (Pen. Code, § 369i, subd. (b) – count 2); and battery at a school (Pen. Code, §§ 242-243.2 – count 3). A few months later, a second judicial wardship petition (Petition B) was filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a). The petition alleged that appellant committed the offense of resisting, delaying, or obstructing an officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)). Following a contested jurisdiction hearing as to Petition A, the juvenile court found true the allegation that appellant had committed a battery (Pen. Code, §§ 242- 243.2). Following a contested jurisdiction hearing as to Petition B, the juvenile court found true the allegation that appellant had resisted, delayed, or obstructed an officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)). At the disposition hearing, the juvenile court declared appellant a ward of the court and placed him on probation. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.