People v. Monroy CA2/6

Filed 7/6/15 P. v. Monroy CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B260401 (Super. Ct. No. BA239230-01) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

JUAN PABLO MONROY,

Defendant and Appellant.

Juan Pablo Monroy appeals an order denying his petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.126 of the Three Strikes Reform Act.1 (§§ 667, 1170.12, 1170.126; Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 2012).) We appointed counsel to represent Monroy in this appeal. Counsel examined the record and filed an opening brief that raised no issues. On March 11, 2015, we advised Monroy by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wishes to raise on appeal. We granted his request for an extension to May 11, 2015, and received his supplemental brief on May 12, 2015. Monroy was convicted in 2004 of being a felon in possession of a firearm. (Former § 12021, subd. (a)(1).) Under the Three Strikes law, the trial court sentenced him to an indeterminate term of 25 years to life in prison.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.

In 2014, Monroy filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.126. The trial court denied the petition. Monroy’s prior conviction for attempted murder disqualifies him for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act. (§§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(IV), 664, 187.) We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Monroy’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibility and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.