In re Natalie P. CA4/1
Filed 7/6/15 In re Natalie P. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re NATALIE P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D067689 SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, (Super. Ct. No. EJ3869) Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ERIKA P.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Gary M.
Bubis, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions.
Paul A. Swiller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel, John E. Philips, Chief Deputy County
Counsel, and Emily K. Harlan, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Erika P. appeals following the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing in the
juvenile dependency case of her daughter, Natalie P. Erika contends the juvenile court
erred by finding the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency)
substantially complied with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et
seq.) and ICWA did not apply. The Agency concedes ICWA notice should have been
sent to the Cherokee tribe, the ICWA-030 form (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.481(a)(4)(A)
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)