People v. Young CA4/2

California Court of Appeal Jun 23, 2015 No. E060765Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the appeal as moot because the defendant was released from her involuntary commitment as a mentally disordered offender.

Issues

Whether the admission of hospital records containing privileged communications requires reversal of the MDO finding.
Whether the trial court erred by admitting evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule.
Whether the appeal is moot following the defendant's release from involuntary commitment.

Disposition. Dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Since defendant is no longer subject to confinement as an MDO, her appeal is moot and will be dismissed.”

“Since defendant has been released from involuntary treatment, her claims are now moot. The appeal is dismissed.”

Filed 6/23/15 P. v. Young CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E060765

v. (Super.Ct.No. FELSS1302614)

KENYATTA YOUNG, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Lorenzo R.

Balderrama, Judge. Dismissed.

Brent Riggs, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Barry Carlton, Seth Friedman and

Sabrina Y. Lane-Erwin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Kenyatta Young was found to be a mentally disordered

offender (MDO)1 by the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) under the criteria of Penal

Code section 2962 on May 24, 2013. Defendant filed a petition in the San Bernardino

County Superior Court pursuant to Penal Code section 2966, subdivision (b), contesting

People v. Young CA4/2

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

KENYATTA YOUNG, OPINION

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

MILLER J.

KING J.

AI Brief