People v. Chavez CA3
Filed 6/15/15 P. v. Chavez CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Glenn) ----
THE PEOPLE, C076071
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 12NCR09572, 12NCR09573) v.
JAVIER CHAVEZ,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Javier Chavez entered negotiated pleas in two related cases, including a plea of guilty to transportation of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, former § 11379, subd. (a).)1 In September 2013, the trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of 20 years in state prison.
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code.
1
At the time of defendant’s conviction, section 11379, subdivision (a) provided that any person who “transports” specified controlled substances including methamphetamine shall be punished by imprisonment. (§ 11379 [and its predecessor version, Stats. 2001, ch. 841, § 7, pp. 6870-6871].) At that time, case law construed the word “transports” to include transport of controlled substances for personal use. (People v. Rogers (1971) 5 Cal.3d 129, 134-135; People v. Eastman (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 668, 673-677.) But effective January 1, 2014, after defendant’s conviction and sentencing, the Legislature amended section 11379 to define “transports” as “transport for sale.” (§ 11379, subd. (c); Stats. 2013, ch. 504, §§ 1-2.)
As his sole claim on appeal, defendant contends section 11379, as amended, should be applied retroactively to reverse his drug transportation conviction. The People agree and so do we. Accordingly, we reverse defendant’s conviction for transportation of methamphetamine and remand for further proceedings. In all other respects, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Case No. 12NCR09572
Defendant stipulated as follows: On September 1, 2012, officers searched defendant and discovered methamphetamine in the pocket of his pants.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)