In re Michael J. CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Apr 1, 2015 No. D066278Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the juvenile court's orders, finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues after conducting an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende and Anders v. California.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence based on an alleged unlawful detention.
Whether the minor's custody credits were properly calculated.
Whether the trial court properly calculated the maximum term of confinement.
Whether the probation conditions imposed were unconstitutionally vague or overbroad.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.”

“The orders are affirmed.”

Filed 4/1/15 In re Michael J. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re MICHAEL J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D066278 THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J231394)

MICHAEL J.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert

Longstreth and Aaron H. Katz, Judges. Affirmed.

Johanna S. Schiavoni, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

An amended petition alleged minor Michael J. came within the provisions of

Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 because it alleged Michael attempted to steal

personal property, by mean of force and fear, from Deyanira G. (in violation of Pen.

Code, §§ 211/664),1 and assaulted her with force likely to cause great bodily injury (in

violation of § 245, subd. (a)(4)), and assaulted another person with force likely to cause

great bodily injury (in violation of § 245, subd. (a)(4)). Michael moved to suppress the

evidence against him, alleging it was the fruit of an unlawful detention. After that motion

In re Michael J. CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J.,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

FACTS

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

IRION, J.

AI Brief