People v. Seehausen CA2/2

Filed 2/27/15 P. v. Seehausen CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B257858

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA069146) v.

SCOTT C. SEEHAUSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:* Defendant Scott C. Seehausen appeals from the July 10, 2014 denial of various demands and motions that he filed in the superior court. These filings related to defendant’s August 21, 2008 convictions for burglary and grand theft and his two strikes sentence of 17 years in state prison.1 (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 487, subd. (a).)2 On June 1, 2009, we affirmed the judgment on appeal.

* BOREN, P.J., CHAVEZ, J., HOFFSTADT, J.

1 We take judicial notice of our unpublished opinion in case No. B211557. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, subd. (d)(1), 459.)

2 All further references to statutes are to the Penal Code unless stated otherwise.

The motions from whose denial defendant now appeals are as follows: (1) a March 21, 2014 motion to vacate the abstract of judgment and recall the commitment based on actual innocence want of jurisdiction; (2) an April 18, 2014 document entitled “Notice of Vested Title Rights and of Vested Title to the Case,” “Notice of Trespass on Title and Trespass on the Case,” “Mandatory Judicial Notice;” (3) a third demand for verified judgment of conviction signed by judge, filed May 7, 2014; (4) a second notice of demand for production of signed [Penal Code, section] 977 waiver of appearance for trial; (5) a third notice of demand for production of duly promulgated statute or enacted law which permits imprisonment absent a verifiable judgment of conviction subscribed by the hand of a state of California superior court judge; (6) a third notice of demand to be advised of charge or alternatively provide the duly promulgated statute or enacted law which permits that an individual may be tried and convicted without being informed of the charges against him; (7) a third demand for verified charging instrument which descends to particulars of offense charged; (8) third demand to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation being charged; (9) third demand for presentation of verified charging instrument; (10) second demand for production of signed [Penal Code, § 977] waiver of appearance for arraignment; (11) third demand to be informed of the offense for which an alleged conviction has been had; (12) third motion for post trial discovery; and (13) third demand for verified charging instrument that descends to particulars of elements charged. On July 10, 2014, the superior court summarily denied the listed motions and demands. Defendant filed a notice of appeal on July 24, 2014. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an “Opening Brief” containing an acknowledgment that he had been unable to find any arguable issues. On September 18, 2014, we advised defendant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. We have received in response: (1) a document filed September 25, 2014, entitled, “Actual and Constructive Notice, Mandatory Judicial Notice Division 4 Evidence Code § 451, Res