People v. Reed CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Feb 19, 2015 No. D065697Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment, finding no reasonably arguable issues on appeal because the defendant failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause required to challenge the validity of his plea, the denial of his motion to withdraw the plea, or his stipulated sentence.

Issues

Whether the trial court erroneously denied the request for a certificate of probable cause.
Whether the trial court erroneously denied the motion to withdraw the guilty plea.
Whether the trial court failed to ensure a factual basis for the plea and admission.
Whether the defendant was lawfully sentenced.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Our review of the record pursuant to Wende, including the possible issues listed by counsel pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable issues on appeal.”

Filed 2/19/15 P. v. Reed CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D065697

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD245230)

TEVIS REED,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Kenneth K. So, Judge. Affirmed.

Laurel M. Nelson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.

Tevis Reed pleaded guilty to one count each of attempted murder, carjacking,

assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury, robbery and burglary. He

admitted inflicting great bodily injury as to the attempted murder, carjacking, and

assault charges. The parties stipulated to a prison term of 16 years, four months.

At the sentencing hearing, Reed moved to withdraw his guilty plea. In a sworn

declaration, Reed claimed (1) "[t]his was a 'PACKAGE DEAL,' " (2) he knew his

codefendants had "gang connections," and he "received threats while in custody,"

(3) he "felt [he] was being rushed to trial and [his] [l]awyer was not ready," (4) he was

People v. Reed CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D065697

TEVIS REED,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

MCINTYRE, J.

MCCONNELL, P. J.

AARON, J.

AI Brief