In re Hill CA4/2
Filed 2/10/15 In re Hill CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re JEFFREY ANDRE HILL, E062128
on Habeas Corpus. (Super.Ct.No. WHCSS1400333)
OPINION
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petition granted
in part and denied in part.
Jeffrey Andre Hill, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, and Jennifer L. Heinisch, Deputy Attorney
General, for Respondent.
This court has reviewed the petition and supporting documents, and has requested
and received an informal response from the Attorney General. In accordance with the
Attorney General’s concession and agreement, we grant relief.
Petitioner has been found suitable for parole but has not been released as the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) believes that he has not
1
yet served the required portion of his sentence. First, although some of the
documentation reflects that one of his two sentences for convictions under Penal Code
section 4502 was to be served concurrently with his term for murder, the actual
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)