People v. Valencia CA2/1
Filed 1/23/15 P. v. Valencia CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, B255191
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA041527) v.
EDWARD GILBERT VALENCIA III,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bruce F. Marrs, Judge. Affirmed. Paul R. Kraus, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent. ___________________________
Edward Gilbert Valencia III was found not guilty by reason of insanity of three counts of arson in violation of Penal Code1 section 451, subdivision (b), and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon in violation of section 245, subdivision (a)(1). Valencia was committed to California Department of Mental Health on June 22, 2001 and transferred from Metropolitan State Hospital to a community outpatient treatment facility in 2004. In 2006, he was transferred to a nonresidential forensic community treatment. On January 28, 2013, the trial court approved the revocation of Valencia’s outpatient status, and Valencia was readmitted to Metropolitan State Hospital. Valencia appealed the revocation of his outpatient status, and we affirmed. (People v. Valencia (Sept. 23, 2014, B250598) [nonpub. opn.].) On March 13, 2014, the department of state hospitals filed a report dated November 20, 2013, which concluded that Valencia “does not present a danger to the health and safety of himself or others,” and “continued treatment at Metropolitan State Hospital is not recommended at this time as he is ready for community outpatient treatment in a less restrictive environment.” Also filed March 13, 2014 was a February 13, 2014 report from the community program director of the Gateways CONREP (Conditional Release Program) Administration. The report concluded that Valencia continued to overestimate his level of functioning and his psychiatric stability, but underestimated his high-risk behaviors and his potential for future dangerousness, and “Mr. Valencia remains a danger to the health and safety of others and as such, should be retained and treated at the state hospital.” (Underline and boldface omitted.) Valencia was present at the hearing on March 13, 2014. The parties submitted on the reports and argued the matter. The trial court noted that the reports gave conflicting recommendations, and ordered Valencia to continue to be confined and treated at Metropolitan State Hospital. Valencia filed this timely appeal. We appointed counsel to represent him, and after examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)