In re Charles P. CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Dec 30, 2014 No. D065142Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the juvenile court's restitution order after finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues upon independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende.

Issues

Whether there was substantial evidence to support the restitution amounts.
Whether the court abused its discretion in its valuation of the car.
Whether the court abused its discretion in requiring restitution for amounts paid to salaried employees.
Whether the court violated the minor's federal due process rights by admitting hearsay evidence.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“After independently reviewing the record for error (see People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442 (Wende)), we have not identified any reasonably arguable appellate issues and affirm the judgment.”

“Our independent review of the record, including the Anders issues identified by counsel, did not disclose any reasonably arguable appellate issue.”

Filed 12/30/14 In re Charles P. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re CHARLES P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D065142 THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J232115)

CHARLES P.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carlos O.

Armour, Judge. Affirmed.

Heather L. Beugen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

INTRODUCTION

Minor appeals a juvenile court judgment directing him to pay victim restitution

totaling $22,211. After independently reviewing the record for error (see People v.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442 (Wende)), we have not identified any reasonably

arguable appellate issues and affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

Minor and an accomplice stole a 1996 BMW 328i, drove it through the gate of a

school, drove it around the school recklessly, and then set it on fire. Minor admitted to

In re Charles P. CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES P.,

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

MCCONNELL, P. J.

HALLER, J.

MCINTYRE, J.

AI Brief