Ontario Mountain Village Assn. v. City of Ontario CA4/2

Filed 12/11/14 Ontario Mountain Village Assn. v. City of Ontario CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ONTARIO MOUNTAIN VILLAGE ASSOCIATION et al., E058344 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1200998) v. OPINION CITY OF ONTARIO,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Barry L. Plotkin,

Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice

pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Briggs Law Corporation, Cory J. Briggs and Mekaela M. Gladden for Plaintiffs

and Appellants.

Best Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette, Richard T. Egger, and Sarah E.

Owsowitz for Defendant and Respondent.

1

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs and appellants, Ontario Mountain Village Association (OMVA) and

Phillip J. Meza, appeal from the judgment denying their complaint for declaratory and

injunctive relief and writ petition to invalidate Ordinance No. 2947, adopted by defendant

and respondent, City of Ontario (the City), in December 2011. The ordinance extended,

by one year, the expiration dates of all development plans, conditional use permits, and