Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

Filed 12/2/14 Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DANA LEE ORCUTT,

Petitioner, E061844

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1309053)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

Respondent;

ALEXANDER PINTO,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate/prohibition. Sunshine

S. Sykes, Judge. Petition granted in part and denied in part.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, John S. Lowenthal, Mathew L. Walker;

Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robert A. Olson, Cynthia E. Tobisman, and David E.

Hackett, for Petitioner.

1

No appearance for Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest.

In this matter we have reviewed the petition and solicited a response from real

party in interest. No response having been received, and based on our own analysis, the

petition for writ of mandate is granted in part. Further, due to the lack of response, we