People v. Glover CA3

Filed 10/17/14 P. v. Glover CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075510

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF105436)

v.

LAURA GLOVER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Laura Glover appeals from an order revoking her probation. Appointed counsel for defendant has asked that we review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment.

1

BACKGROUND In March 2011, defendant pleaded no contest to child endangerment likely to produce great bodily harm (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a))1 and misdemeanor disorderly conduct due to public intoxication (§ 647, subd. (f)), and admitted a prior prison enhancement (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) in Yolo County Superior Court. In July 2011, the trial court ordered and suspended execution of a seven-year sentence, and placed defendant on formal probation for five years. Among the terms of her probation, defendant was ordered to complete a 52-week parenting program, enter and successfully complete a 180-day outpatient substance abuse treatment program, and abstain from the use or possession of alcohol. Twice in 2012, defendant was alleged to have violated her probation. One allegation was for attending a court-ordered parenting class while intoxicated, which she disputed. The other was based in her termination from the court-ordered parenting program for bringing a recording device to class on two occasions in violation of program rules. The trial court struck both allegations and reinstated probation on the same terms and conditions previously imposed. On June 1, 2013, defendant was arrested in Yuba County after sheriff’s deputies were dispatched to her campsite to conduct a welfare check after receiving a call that she had slapped her child in the face. Deputies knocked on the door of the motor home at the campsite and told defendant they were there to conduct a welfare check, but defendant refused to allow them to speak to the child. The deputies noted the child’s face was red, and she appeared to be scared and had been crying. Defendant attempted to close the door to the motor home, but the deputies prevented her from doing so. One deputy repeated that he needed to check on the child, and defendant began yelling at him to go