People v. Estrada CA2/5

Filed 10/15/14 P. v. Estrada CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B255311

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA088554) v.

ALEXANDER ESTRADA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Scott T. Millington, Judge. Affirmed. California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Cheryl Lutz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Alexander Estrada (defendant) appealed from the judgment of conviction. On appeal, appointed counsel for defendant filed an opening brief in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 requesting that this court conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are any issues, which if resolved in defendant’s favor would require reversal or modification of the judgment or appealable order. On August 22, 2014, we gave notice to defendant that his counsel had failed to find any arguable issues and that defendant had 30 days within which to submit by brief or letter any grounds of appeal, contentions, or arguments he wished this court to consider. Defendant did not file a response brief or letter. After independently reviewing the record, we affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND