People v. Ramborger CA3
Filed 10/8/14 P. v. Ramborger CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COPY
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C075129
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F06016)
v.
MICHAEL RAY RAMBORGER,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Michael Ray Ramborger asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no errors, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) Narcotics officers were performing surveillance of defendant, who was out on bail for another crime and was
1
subject to a search condition while on post release community supervision, when they detained defendant and searched the vehicle he was driving. They found 40 grams of methamphetamine and $400 on his person. In the car, they found an additional 130 grams of methamphetamine, seven grams of heroin, numerous baggies, a digital scale, a loaded handgun, and additional ammunition for the gun. Defendant was charged with possession of methamphetamine for purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378; count 1); transportation of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a); count 2); possession of heroin for purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351; count 3); transportation of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a); count 4); possession of a handgun by a convicted felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 5; undesignated section references are to the Penal Code); possession of ammunition by a convicted felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 6); and receipt of stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a); count 7). As to counts 1 through 4, it was alleged defendant had suffered six prior felony convictions within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivisions (a) and (c), and had served six prior prison terms for those convictions within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). It was also alleged defendant committed all charged offenses while released on bail relative to another offense within the meaning of section 12022.1. Defendant pleaded no contest to counts 1 through 5 and admitted the six prior convictions, with the understanding he would be sentenced to prison (with a floor of 18 years eight months and a lid of 24 years eight months) and remaining charges and allegations would be dismissed. At sentencing, the trial court declined to strike any of defendant’s prior strikes, determined defendant was ineligible for probation, sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of 24 years eight months, and dismissed the remaining charges and allegations. The aggregate sentence is comprised of: the upper term of five years for count 4; the upper term of three years for count 1, stayed pursuant to section 654; one year (one-third of the middle term) for count 2; four years for count 3, stayed
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)