People v. Hatch CA4/3

Filed 8/21/14 P. v. Hatch CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). The opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G049739

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 13WF0702, 12HF2458, 12HF3628) GREGORY RYAN HATCH,

Defendant and Appellant. OPINION

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Terri K. Flynn-Peister, Judge. Affirmed.

Erica Gambale, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *

Gregory Ryan Hatch pleaded guilty to narcotics and other offenses in three separate cases. The trial court imposed and suspended execution of sentence, and placed Hatch on probation on various terms and conditions, including successful completion of a one-year drug treatment program. Hatch failed to complete the program and admitted he violated probation. The court revoked and terminated probation, and lifted the suspension of the previously imposed sentence. Hatch’s appointed counsel filed a brief under the procedures outlined in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Counsel summarized the facts of the

case, the procedural history, and possible legal issues with citations to the record and appropriate authority, but raised no specific issues, and asked this court to review the record to determine whether there were any arguable issues. Counsel did not argue

against her client or assert the appeal was frivolous. Counsel submitted a declaration stating she reviewed the case, she advised Hatch of the nature of the brief, she sent Hatch a copy of the brief and the appellate record, and informed him he could file a brief on his