In re William H. CA4/3
Filed 7/31/14 In re William H. CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re WILLIAM H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE, G048693 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. DL043809) v. OPINION WILLIAM H.,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gregory W. Jones, Judge. Affirmed in part, dismissed as moot in part. Susan L. Ferguson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, William M. Wood and Brendon W. Marshall, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
The juvenile court found true an allegation that William H. (who was a minor at the time of the alleged conduct but has since turned 18 years old) committed petty theft. (Pen. Code, §§ 484, subd. (a), 488.) The court declared minor to be a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and placed him on formal probation (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 730, subd. (b)). Minor challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the petty theft finding, claiming in particular that the prosecution did not prove the corpus delicti independently from minor’s extrajudicial statements. Minor also challenges a probation condition limiting his freedom of association. We affirm the judgment and dismiss minor’s challenge to the probation condition as moot.
FACTS
At 10:25 p.m. on February 23, 2013, Irvine police responded to the scene of a collision between a car and pedestrian. Minor was being treated by paramedics. Nearby were a broken skateboard and a damaged plastic hand basket from a Ralph’s grocery store (Ralph’s); within or near the basket were a bottle of vodka and multiple broken bottles of Mike’s Hard Lemonade. Ralph’s was a few hundred yards away from the scene of the accident.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)