People v. Vivanco CA4/2
Filed 7/11/14 P. v. Vivanco CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E060956
v. (Super.Ct.No. ) SWF1205402
RICHARD CHARLES VIVANCO, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Albert J. Wojcik, Judge.
Affirmed.
Leslie A. Rose, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1
I
INTRODUCTION
On October 23, 2012, an information charged defendant and appellant Richard
Charles Vivanco1 with sale/transportation of a controlled substance, tar heroin under
Health and Safety code sections 11352, subdivision (a) (count 1); possession for sale of a
controlled substance, tar heroin under Health and Safety Code section 11351 (count 2);
possession of liquid heroin under Health and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a)
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)