People v. Yang CA4/3

Filed 6/27/14 P. v. Yang CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G049154

v. (Super. Ct. No. 11CF0033)

HAHN WOO YANG, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, John Conley, Judge. Affirmed. Nancy S. Brandt, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

THE COURT: *

Hahn Woo Yang1 appeals from an order of the trial court finding him in violation of his probation and sentencing him to two years in state prison as a result of his conviction in 2011. Hahn filed a timely notice of appeal, and this court appointed counsel to represent Hahn in the appeal. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, counsel filed a brief which sets forth the facts of the case, and although counsel does not argue against her client, counsel has advised the court no issues were found to argue on appellant’s behalf. Hahn was given the opportunity to file written argument on his own behalf, but he has not availed himself of the opportunity. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106.) We have examined the entire record and have found no arguable issue. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 28, 2011, a jury convicted Hahn of second degree robbery, second degree burglary, and receiving stolen property.2 At the sentencing hearing the following month, imposition of sentence was suspended and Hahn was placed on four years probation on condition, inter alia, that he “[v]iolate no law.” On January 3, 2013, Hahn’s probation was ordered revoked as a result of a new misdemeanor case charging Hahn with elder abuse against his father, and a petition was filed alleging a fourth