In re T.R. CA6

Filed 6/23/14 In re T.R. CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re T.R., a Person Coming H039845 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. JV39538)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

T.R.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Minor T.R. appeals from the disposition order of the juvenile court, which followed a probation violation hearing. T.R.'s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) in which no issues are raised. On January 1, 2014, we notified T.R. of his counsel's brief. We gave T.R. leave to file, within 30 days, a brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered by this court. That time has elapsed and T.R. has not submitted a letter or brief. We have reviewed the entire record and find no arguable issues. Accordingly, we affirm the juvenile court's disposition order.

Proceedings in the Juvenile Court On September 19, 2012, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 (602 petition). In the petition the district attorney alleged that (1) T.R. carried alcohol in a vehicle while under the age of 21 in violation of Vehicle Code section 23224, subdivision (a), a misdemeanor (count one); (2) T.R. drove while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (a), a misdemeanor (count two); and (3) T.R. drove with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 or more in violation of Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (b), a misdemeanor (count three). On October 29, 2012, after the juvenile court informed T.R. of his constitutional rights and he waived those rights, T.R admitted the charges in counts one and three and the district attorney moved to dismiss count two. The court accepted T.R's admissions and found the allegations in the petition to be true.1 The court set a disposition hearing for October 29, 2012. On October 29, 2012, the juvenile court adopted the recommendations in the probation officer's report that the court place T.R. under the supervision of a probation officer for six months without the court declaring T.R. a ward of court.2 (Welf &. Inst. Code, § 725.) Among other things, the court ordered that T.R. participate in drug/alcohol counseling, anger management counseling, and/or individual counseling. Further, the court ordered that T.R. not use or possess or be under the influence of any form of a controlled or illegal substance, and that T.R. submit to random drug and alcohol testing at least twice a month. In addition, the court ordered that T.R. complete 40 hours of public service work by February 15, 2013, and that he attend school regularly with no unexcused absences.