In re A.M. CA2/8

California Court of Appeal Jun 13, 2014 No. B248434MUnpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the father's appeal of jurisdictional and dispositional orders as moot because the juvenile court had subsequently terminated dependency jurisdiction and issued final family law exit orders.

Issues

Whether an appeal of juvenile court jurisdictional and dispositional orders is rendered moot by the subsequent termination of dependency jurisdiction.

Disposition. dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“As we explain, we conclude the appeal has been rendered moot by the juvenile court’s termination of jurisdiction, and therefore dismiss the appeal.”

“The termination of dependency jurisdiction by the juvenile court, while an appeal of an interim ruling by the juvenile court is pending, moots the appeal.”

Filed 6/13/14 In re A.M. CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

In re A.M. et al., Persons Coming Under B248434 the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK96692) LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Plaintiff and Respondent, and DENYING PETITION FOR v. REHEARING

E.M., [no change in judgment]

Defendant and Appellant;

A.M. et al., Respondents.

THE COURT: IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed in the above-captioned matter on May 29, 2014, be modified as follows: On page 4, line 7, delete the sentence beginning with “Father has not challenged the jurisdictional findings . . .” and replace with: Father has not challenged the jurisdictional findings as to mother. There is no change in the judgment. Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

_______________________________________________________________________ BIGELOW, P. J. FLIER, J. GRIMES, J.

Filed 5/29/14 In re A.M. CA2/8 (unmodified version) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

In re A.M. CA2/8

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

FLIER, J.

AI Brief