People v. Hicks CA4/2

Filed 6/6/14 P. v. Hicks CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E059671

v. (Super.Ct.No. FWV1301639)

SEAN DARYL HICKS, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Stanford E.

Reichert, Judge. Affirmed.

Steven A. Brody, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Sean Daryl Hicks was charged by information with

transportation of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a), count 1)

and possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a), count

1

2). It was also alleged that he had suffered a prior conviction of Health & Safety Code

section 11378, within the meaning of Health & Safety Code section 11370.2, subdivision

(c), and that he had served one prior prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)).