People v. Lopez CA4/1

California Court of Appeal May 1, 2014 No. D064790Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's 15-year prison sentence after conducting an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende and Anders v. California, finding no arguable appellate issues.

Issues

Was appellant properly advised of his constitutional rights and consequences of pleading before entering his guilty plea?
Did the trial court err when it denied appellant's Marsden motion?
Was appellant adequately informed that he would be sentenced to the maximum sentence of 15 years if he failed to appear at sentencing?
Did the trial court correctly impose the stipulated sentence as negotiated in the plea agreement?

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We discern no arguable appellate issues and affirm.”

“We have reviewed the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and considered the issues suggested by counsel, but discerned no reasonably arguable appellate issues.”

Filed 5/1/14 P. v. Lopez CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D064790

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD245557)

ADRIAN LOPEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eugenia

Eyherabide, Judge. Affirmed.

Patricia Ihara, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Adrian Lopez appeals the judgment sentencing him to prison for the agreed

15-year term after he pled guilty to robbery, admitted allegations of a prior serious felony

conviction, and did not appear at the scheduled sentencing hearing. Appointed counsel

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) and People v.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) that identified six issues upon which he requested

our independent review. We discern no arguable appellate issues and affirm.

People v. Lopez CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D064790

ADRIAN LOPEZ,

BACKGROUND

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

IRION, J.

O'ROURKE, J.

AI Brief