People v. Suzuki CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Apr 16, 2014 No. D064401Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction after conducting an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende and finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues.

Issues

Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
Whether the trial court judges, district attorney, and public defenders were properly appointed.
Whether the eviction was contrary to past court judgments.
Whether the lack of signatures on certain case documents warrants reversal.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“After having independently reviewed the entire record for error as required by Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) and Wende, we affirm.”

“A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues suggested by counsel and Suzuki, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue.”

Filed 4/16/14 P. v. Suzuki CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D064401

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN273301)

TOSHIO SUZUKI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Daniel B.

Goldstein, Judge. Affirmed.

Dawn S. Mortazavi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal; Toshio Suzuki, in

pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Toshio Suzuki appeals from a judgment following a guilty verdict in a bench trial

on charges of misdemeanor assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)),1 resisting an

1 Unless otherwise indicated all further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

executive officer (§ 69), disobeying a court order (§ 166, subd. (a)(4)), and attempting to

harm or interfere with a police animal (§ 664).

Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief presenting no argument for reversal, but

inviting this court to review the record for error in accordance with People v. Wende

People v. Suzuki CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D064401

TOSHIO SUZUKI,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

IRION, J.

AARON, J.

AI Brief