In re C.H. CA2/5

Filed 4/15/14 In re C.H. CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re C. H., a Person Coming Under the B249577 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PJ49639)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

C. H.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Morton Rochman, Judge and Robert Totten, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed with instructions. Adrian K. Patton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews, and Analee J. Brodie, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

The juvenile court sustained a petition alleging that appellant H C. possessed a weapon on school grounds in violation of Penal Code section 626.10, subdivision (a)(1), a felony. The court found that appellant was a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, adjudged appellant to be a ward of the court, reduced the offense to a misdemeanor and placed appellant on home probation. Appellant appeals from the order sustaining the petition and adjudging appellant to be a ward of the court, contending the minute order listing the terms of his probation incorrectly includes term number 28. Respondent agrees. We agree as well, and order the term stricken. We affirm the juvenile court's order in all other respects.