In re F.B. CA2/8
Filed 4/1/14 In re F.B. CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
In re F.B., a Person Coming Under the B247981 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK 96287)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
L.E. et al.
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, D. Zeke Zeidler, Judge. Affirmed. Aida Aslanian, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant L.E. Roni Keller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant M.B. John F. Krattli, County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel, and Tracey F. Dodds, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
We affirm the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. Both were supported by substantial evidence. FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1. Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300 Petition1 The petition as later sustained alleged: “The child, [F.B.]’s father, [M.B.], and mother, [L.E.], have a history of engaging in violent altercations in the child’s presence. On 10/24/12, the father pushed the mother into a gate in the child’s presence, causing the mother to strike the mother’s head against the gate to sustain swelling to the mother’s head. The father grabbed the mother’s arm and pushed the mother against the bushes, injuring the mother in the child’s presence. On prior occasions, the father grabbed and pulled the mother by the mother’s arms. On prior occasions, the father struck the mother, inflicting scratches to the mother. The child’s mother failed to protect the child in that the mother allowed the father to reside in the child’s home and have unlimited access to the child. The father’s violent conduct against the mother and the mother’s failure to protect the child endangers the child’s physical health and safety and places the child at risk of physical harm, damage, danger and failure to protect.” “The child, [F.B.]’s mother, [L.E.], has a history of substance abuse and is a current abuser of methamphetamine and alcohol, which renders the mother incapable of providing the child with regular care and supervision. On prior occasions in 2012 and 2011, the mother was under the influence of illicit drugs and alcohol, while the child was in the mother’s care and supervision. The mother’s abuse of illicit drugs endangers the child’s physical health and safety and places the child at risk of physical harm and damage.” “The child, [F.B.]’s father, [M.B.], has a history of substance abuse and is a current abuser of methamphetamine, which renders the father incapable of providing the child with regular care and supervision. On prior occasions in 2012 and 2011, the father
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)