J.M. v. L.H. CA4/2

Filed 3/20/14 J.M. v. L.H. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

J.M.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E053375

v. (Super.Ct.No. TED006074)

L.H., OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Mark Ashton Cope,

Judge. Dismissed.

L.H., in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

L.H. (Mother) and J.M. (Father) share a daughter, A.H. The central issue in

Mother’s and Father’s litigation is child custody. The family court determined Mother

is a vexatious litigant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391, subd. (b).) In April 2011, the trial court

denied Mother’s request to file a motion. Mother contends the family court erred by

denying her request to file a motion. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

1

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 4, 2010, Mother was deemed a vexatious litigant. In April 2011,

Mother requested permission to file new litigation. Specifically, Mother wanted to file