People v. Helms CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Jan 28, 2014 No. D063900Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court after finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues following a review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred by ordering restitution to a victim not named in the felony complaint.
Whether the defendant was entitled to notice and a hearing before seized funds were released as restitution.
Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to return seized property.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.”

Filed 1/28/14 P. v. Helms CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D063900

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD242367)

KATHLEEN ANN HELMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Howard H.

Shore, Judge. Affirmed.

Cannon & Harris, Donna L. Harris, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

INTRODUCTION

Kathleen Ann Helms pled guilty to four counts of conspiring with another to treat

the sick and afflicted without a license, in violation of Business & Professions Code

section 2052, subdivision (b). The trial court sentenced Helms to a total term of three

years, and ordered Helms to pay approximately $67,500 in restitution to four victims.

We affirm the judgment.

II.

People v. Helms CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D063900

KATHLEEN ANN HELMS,

INTRODUCTION

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

III.

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

AARON, J.

HUFFMAN, J.

AI Brief