In re K.T. CA2/3
Filed 1/10/14 In re K.T. CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re K.T., a Person Coming Under the B244335 Juvenile Court Law. _____________________________________ (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NJ25663) THE PEOPLE, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Plaintiff and Respondent, AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] v.
K.T.,
Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 19, 2013, be modified as follows: 1. On page 2, in the last sentence of the second paragraph, the word “inside” is changed to “ ‘attached’ and ‘in’ ” her ears, so the sentence reads: She had attached earphones to the telephone, and the earbuds of the earphones were “attached” and “in” her ears.
2. On page 2, at the end of the second paragraph, add as footnote 1 the following: 1 During cross-examination, Yolanda T. explained, as follows, concerning her two earbuds. “They were white, and they had blue at the buds, and one of the buds was busted.” The “buds” themselves were approximately “a centimeter and a half” in diameter. They “easily” fit into her ear. “[T]heywere not like the Skull Candy ones where they’re stuck in your ears. They’re just placed on top of the ear.” 3. On page 3, in the second sentence of the second full paragraph, delete “and a companion were” and replace the phrase with the word “was” so the sentence reads: Shortly thereafter, appellant was detained. 4. On page 3, in the fourth and fifth sentences of the second full paragraph on, delete the words “Neither” and “nor the other youth accompanying appellant had.” Add the words “did not have” and “and.” The sentences should read as follows: Appellant did not have her earphones, and she never recovered them. There is no change in the judgment. Respondent’s petition for rehearing is denied.
2
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)