People v. Anderson CA5

Filed 1/6/14 P. v. Anderson CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, F064733 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F11904013) v.

AMBER VIRGINIA ANDERSON, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE PEOPLE, F064786

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F11904013)

v. Fresno County ISAAC VANDRELL BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Arlan L. Harrell, Judge.

Marilyn G. Burkhardt, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Amber Virginia Anderson, Defendant and Appellant. Michael B. McPartland, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Isaac Vandrell Brown, Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen G. Herndon and Kevin L. Quade, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- INTRODUCTION Defendants Amber Virginia Anderson (Anderson) and Isaac Vandrell Brown (Brown) stand convicted of multiple offenses arising from a crime spree they allegedly perpetrated in the summer of 2011.1 They were accused and convicted of robbing multiple victims over a span of several days. The only substantive dispute2 between the parties on appeal relates to whether the sentencing court violated Penal Code3 section 654 in imposing prison terms on two firearm enhancements. We conclude the court did not violate section 654. In accordance with two concessions offered by the Attorney General, we order modifications to the abstract of judgment and to Anderson’s sentence on count 6. We otherwise affirm.

1 Defendant Anderson’s appeal is our case number F064733, and defendant Brown’s appeal is our case number F064786. On our own motion, this court consolidated the two appeals. 2 All other issues raised by defendants are conceded by the Attorney General. 3 All subsequent statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.