In re Ayache CA4/3
Filed 12/16/13 In re Ayache CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re EDWARD ALI AYACHE G049290
on Habeas Corpus. (Super. Ct. No. 09ZF0052)
OPINION
Original proceedings; petition for a habeas corpus, after judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Petition granted. Edward Ali Ayache, in pro. per. for Petitioner. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Peter Quon, Jr., and Raquel M. Gonzalez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *
Petitioner Edward Ali Ayache was convicted of murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a); all undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code) carried out for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(22)), active participation in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a)), and two counts of attempted murder (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664, subd. (a)). The jury found the murder and attempted murders were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)), that Ayache personally discharged a firearm causing death (12022.53, subd. (d)) in connection with the murder, and that he personally discharged a firearm in connection with the attempted murders. Those offenses occurred on November 18, 2000. The jury also found Ayache guilty of three offenses alleged to have occurred on January 9, 2009: possession of a loaded firearm by a felon (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)), active participation in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a); count six), and a misdemeanor, resisting or delaying a law enforcement officer (§ 148, subd. (a)). The court sentenced defendant to life without the possibility of parole on the murder and a consecutive 25 years to life on the firearm enhancement alleged in connection with the murder; on one of the attempted murder convictions, a consecutive life term, plus 20 years on the firearm enhancement attached to that offense; on the other attempted murder conviction, a consecutive term of seven years (the middle term) plus 20 years for the attached firearm enhancement. In addition, the court sentenced Ayache to a consecutive term of two years (the middle term) on his conviction for felon in possession of a firearm on January 9, 2009, and a concurrent two-year term on count six. Ayache appealed and we affirmed the judgment (People v. Ayache (Mar. 8, 2012, G043201) [nonpub. opn.]) prior the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Rodriguez (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1125 [a defendant acting alone does not violate section 186.22, subdivision (a)].) Ayache acted alone on January 9, 2009, and had Rodriguez been decided at the time we considered the issue, we would have reversed his conviction on count six for violation of section 186.22, subdivision (a) on that date. Ayache filed a
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)