People v. Rodgers CA4/1

Filed 12/16/13 P. v. Rodgers CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D064251

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD232089)

MELVIN RODGERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Affirmed.

Melvin Rodgers appeals from a postjudgment order denying his motion to transfer

his probation department supervision to Arizona. Appointed appellate counsel filed a

brief presenting no argument for reversal, but inviting this court to review the record for

error in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Rodgers did

not respond to our invitation to file a supplemental brief. After having independently

reviewed the entire record for error as required by Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S.

738 (Anders) and Wende, we affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In August 2011, Rodgers was convicted of possessing cocaine base for sale