In re Jasmine C.CA2/5

Filed 11/14/13 In re Jasmine C.CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re JASMINE C., A Person Coming B247783 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK60354)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

PEDRO C. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elizabeth Kim, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed. Amy Z. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for the minor and Appellant. Marsha F. Levine, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Pedro C. John F. Krattli, County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel and William D. Thetford, Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent.

I. INTRODUCTION

The father, Pedro C., and the child, Jasmine C., appeal from the juvenile court’s February 13, 2013 jurisdiction and disposition orders. They challenge the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (d) and (j).1 The juvenile court found the child was at substantial risk of harm based on the father’s prolong sexual abuse of Michelle V. Michelle is the child’s half-sister. In addition, the father and the child object to the disposition order removing Jasmine from the father’s custody. We affirm the jurisdiction and disposition orders.