In Re Julie S.

48 Cal.App.4th 988 (1996) In re JULIE S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LAURA S., Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. B100598. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

August 19, 1996. [989] COUNSEL

Harry Zimmerman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, Joe Ben Hudgens, Deputy County Counsel, and Tracey F. Resnick for Plaintiff and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]

OPINION

TURNER, P.J. —

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal is from dependency proceedings under the Welfare and Institutions Code.[1] Laura S., the mother, appeals, following termination of her parental rights pursuant to section 366.26. On appeal, she raises issues concerning orders pursuant to section 366.22 terminating family reunification services, referring her minor daughter, Julie S., for adoptive planning, and setting the section 366.26 hearing. The mother previously filed a petition for extraordinary writ challenging the findings and orders pursuant to section 366.22. That petition was decided on the merits. Under these circumstances, the order setting a section 366.26 hearing is not appealable following the [990] termination of parental rights. (§ 366.26, subd. (l)(1); Cal. Rules of Court,[2] rules 39.1B(d), 1435(b), and 1436.5(c); see Guillermo G. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal. App.4th 1168, 1172-1173 [39 Cal. Rptr.2d 748].) Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.