In Re Khalid H.

6 Cal.App.4th 733 (1992) 8 Cal. Rptr.2d 414 In re KHALID H. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TAE H. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. D014701. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

April 30, 1992. [735] COUNSEL

Scott A. Wahrenbrock, M. Elizabeth Handy and Charles Leland, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants.

Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr., County Counsel, Susan Strom, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Terri L. Richardson, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kenneth H. Stone, Thomas E. Nagle and Judith Ellen Ganz for Minors.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]

OPINION

NARES, J.

Tae H. (mother) and Leland C. (father) appeal an order of the juvenile court declaring their children, Khalid H. and Victoria C., dependents of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 300. They also appeal from the dispositional order issued by the juvenile court removing the children from their home and placing them in foster care pursuant to section 361.5, subdivision (b)(1).

The mother claims the jurisdictional order must be reversed because the court's finding was not supported by sufficient evidence to establish that she suffered from a mental illness.

.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .[*]

DISCUSSION

I. THE JURISDICTIONAL ORDER IS SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE