In Re Keyonie R.

42 Cal.App.4th 1569 (1996) 50 Cal. Rptr.2d 221 In re KEYONIE R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALBERTA M., Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. G017718. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

February 28, 1996. [1570] COUNSEL

Roni Keller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Laurence M. Watson, Chief Assistant County Counsel, and Nicholas S. Chrisos, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Harold LaFlamme, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

[1571] OPINION

WALLIN, J.

Alberta M. appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter, Keyonie R., age 20 months. She claims (1) the reports prepared by the social services agency (SSA) were hearsay and should not have been admitted into evidence, and (2) the trial court erroneously selected adoption as the permanent plan for the minor. We affirm the judgment, as neither argument has merit.

Keyonie R., the sixth child of Alberta M.,[1] was born with a positive toxicology screen for cocaine in May 1993. She was declared a dependent of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b) and (j)[2] based on Alberta's criminal record for drug-related offenses, her drug use during pregnancy, and her similar treatment of a sibling. During the next 12 months, Alberta failed to reunify with Keyonie. She was incarcerated twice and resumed drug use when out of prison; her visits were sporadic. At the 12-month hearing in August 1994, reunification services were terminated and a selection and implementation hearing was set.