Security First National Bank v. Denton

California Court of Appeal Feb 13, 1936 No. Civ. No. 1767Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings based on the respondent's confession of error and the parties' stipulation.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be reversed based on a confession of error and stipulation by the parties.

Disposition. reversed and remanded

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings”

“The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith.”

11 Cal.App.2d 707 (1936) SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent,

MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 1767. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.

February 13, 1936. John Ralph Wilson and McKinstry, Haber & Coombes for Appellants.

William C. Crossland for Respondent.

The Court.

[1] The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and that the remittitur be issued forthwith.

The errors pointed out appear to be material, prejudicial and sufficient to justify a reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith. [708]

Security First National Bank v. Denton

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief